Official Journal Health Science of Prince of Songkla University

  • Home
  • Search
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • Guide for Authors
  • Publication Ethics
  • Editorial Board
  • Submit
  • About
  • Contact
  • Online-first Articles
  • EVENTS
  • Review Process
Home > Online-first > Tepakorn

Validity and Reliability of a Thai-Translated Malnutrition Screening Tool in an Outpatient Setting: A Comparison with the GLIM Criteria

Jitrawee Tepakorn, Kasidid Lawongsa, Sirakarn Tejavanija, Kulachade Gesakomol, Patsri Srisuwan

Abstract

Objective: The malnutrition screening tool (MST) has been widely validated for detecting malnutrition in various countries. However, its applicability in Thai outpatient settings remains unexplored. This study aimed to translate the MST into Thai and assess its validity and reliability compared to the global leadership initiative on malnutrition (GLIM) criteria.
Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, including 248 participants. Nutritional status was evaluated using the Thai-translated MST (T-MST), mini nutritional assessment-short form (MNA-SF), and GLIM criteria, which included bioelectrical impedance analysis for muscle mass assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating charateristic curve (ROC-AUC), test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency (item-total score correlation and Cronbach’s alpha) were analyzed to assess the MST’s performance relative to the GLIM criteria.
Results: The Thai version of the MST demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.976, p-value<0.001) and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.917, p-value<0.001). It showed strong agreement with the GLIM criteria (Kappa=0.843), comparable to the MNA-SF (Kappa=0.834). Internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha=0.794). The T-MST achieved a sensitivity of 86.5% and specificity of 96.0%, while the MNA-SF showed a sensitivity of 93.2% and specificity of 93.1% against the GLIM criteria. Both tools demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy (ROC-AUC: T-MST=0.907, MNA-SF=0.929).
Conclusion: The T-MST is a reliable and efficient tool for malnutrition screening in outpatient settings. Its simplicity and ease of use make it particularly valuable in time-constrained environments. However, ongoing validation across diverse populations and settings is essential to ensure consistent performance across different clinical contexts.

 

 Keywords

global leadership initiative on malnutrition; malnutrition screening tool; outpatient settings; reliability; validity

 Full Text:

PDF

References

Elia M. The cost of malnutrition in England and potential cost savings from nutritional interventions (short version) a report on the cost of disease-related malnutrition in England and a budget impact analysis of implementing the NICE clinical guidelines/quality standard on nutritional support in adults [monograph on the Internet]. Redditch: British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; 2015 [cited 2024 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.bapen.org.uk/pdfs/economic-report-short.pdf

Serón-Arbeloa C, Labarta-Monzón L, Puzo-Foncillas J, Mallor-Bonet T, Lafita-López A, Bueno-Vidales N, et al. Malnutrition screening and assessment. Nutrients 2022;14:2392.

Barker L, Gout B, Crowe T. Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2011;8:514-27.

Tappenden KA, Quatrara B, Parkhurst ML, Malone AM, Fanjiang G, Ziegler TR. Critical role of nutrition in improving quality of care. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2013;37:482-97.

Kuzu MA, Terzioğlu H, Genç V, Erkek AB, Ozban M, Sonyürek P, et al. Preoperative nutritional risk assessment in predicting postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major surgery. World J Surg 2006;30:378-90.

Reber E, Gomes F, Vasiloglou MF, Schuetz P, Stanga Z. Nutritional risk screening and assessment. J Clin Med 2019;8:1065.

Ala A, Chen F. Appointment scheduling problem in complexity systems of the healthcare services: a comprehensive review. J Healthc Eng 2022;2022:e5819813.

Han WM, Koo JY, Lim YY, Iyer P, Ong C, Tong JW, et al. Implementation of a nutrition screening tool to improve nutritional status of children with cancer in Singapore’s largest paediatric hospital. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e000944.

Cederholm T, Jensen GL, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition - a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. Clin Nutr 2019;38:1-9.

Omidvari AH, Vali Y, Murray SM, Wonderling D, Rashidian A. Nutritional screening for improving professional practice for patient outcomes in hospital and primary care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:CD005539.

Isenring EA, Bauer JD, Banks M, Gaskill D. The malnutrition screening tool is a useful tool for identifying malnutrition risk in residential aged care. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009;22:545-50.

Ferguson M, Capra S, Bauer J, Banks M. Development of a valid and reliable malnutrition screening tool for adult acute hospital patients. Nutrition 1999;15:458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(99)00084-2.

Isenring EA, Banks M, Ferguson M, Bauer JD. Beyond malnutrition screening: appropriate methods to guide nutrition care for aged care residents. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012;112:376-81.

Isenring EA, Capra S, Bauer JD. Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology out-patients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. Br J Cancer 2004;91:447-52.

Kondrup J. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 2003;22:321-36.

Paur I, Smedshaug GB, Haugum B, Bye A, Eliassen E, Flottorp TL, et al. The Norwegian directorate of health recommends malnutrition screening tool (MST) for all adults. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2022;52:28-31.

Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, et al. Validation of the mini nutritional assessment short-form (MNA®-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 2009;13:782-8.

Tran QC, Banks M, Hannan-Jones M, Ngoc T, Gallegos D. Validity of four nutritional screening tools against subjective global assessment for inpatient adults in a low-middle income country in Asia. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018;72:979–85.

Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.

Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice [homepage on the Internet]. 3rd ed. New Jersy: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2015 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. Available from: Available from: https://books.google.co.th/books/about/Foundations_of_Clinical_Research.html?id=apNJPgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y

Wu ML, Courtney MD, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Finlayson K, Isenring EA. Validity of the malnutrition screening tool for older adults at high risk of hospital readmission. J Gerontol Nurs 2012;38:38-45.

Jensen GL, Cederholm T, Correia MITD, Gonzalez MC, Fukushima R, Higashiguchi T, et al. GLIM criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition: a consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2018;43:32-40.

Aloy Dos Santos T, Luft VC, Souza GC, de Albuquerque Santos Z, Keller Jochims AM, Carnevale de Almeida J. Malnutrition screening tool and malnutrition universal screening tool as a predictors of prolonged hospital stay and hospital mortality: a cohort study. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2023;54:430-5.

Isenring E, Cross G, Daniels L, Kellett E, Koczwara B. Validity of the malnutrition screening tool as an effective predictor of nutritional risk in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2006;14:1152–6.

Rubenstein LZ, Harker JO, Salvà A, Guigoz Y, Vellas B. Screening for undernutrition in geriatric practice: developing the short-form mini-nutritional assessment (MNA-SF). J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M366-72.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20251220

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

SUBMIT A PAPER

JHSMR accepts online submission through

AHR-iCON 2025

Journal Metrics


2020
Acceptance rate: 52%
2021
Acceptance rate: 27.8%
2022 (March)
Acceptance rate: 15.6%
2023 (June)
Acceptance rate: 23.6%
2024 (June)
Acceptance rate: 19%


Submission to final decision
74 days

Acceptance to publication
40 days

0.6
2024CiteScore
 
 
31st percentile
Powered by Scopus
About The Authors

Jitrawee Tepakorn
Family Practice Outpatient Department, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Kasidid Lawongsa
Family Practice Outpatient Department, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Sirakarn Tejavanija
Division of Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Kulachade Gesakomol
Family Practice Outpatient Department, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Patsri Srisuwan
Family Practice Outpatient Department, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Ratchathewi, Bangkok 10400,
Thailand

Article Tools
Abstract
Print this article
Indexing metadata
How to cite item
Email this article (Login required)
Email the author (Login required)

Supported by

 

JHSMR now Indexed in



Scopus logo.svg






Image result for crossref





PSUMJ Homepage

Keywords COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Thailand Vietnam children computed tomography cross-cultural adaptation depression diabetes diabetes mellitus elderly knowledge mental health mortality prevalence quality of life reliability risk factor risk factors treatment validity
Journal Content

Browse
  • By Issue
  • By Author
  • By Title
Font Size

Open Journal Systems